ANALISIS EVALUATIF PELAKSANAAN SUSCATIN BERBASIS MODEL CIPP DI KUA KECAMATAN TIDORE KEPULAUAN

Fatum Abubakar; Nur Azizah Rahman; Ubaedillah; Mirnawati Ali; Siti Barora

doi:10.24239/familia.v6i1.259

Authors

Fatum Abubakar Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate Author
Nur Azizah Rahman Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate Author
Ubaedillah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate Author
Mirnawati Ali Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate Author
Siti Barora Universitas Khairun Ternate Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24239/familia.v6i1.259

Keywords:

Effectiveness, SUSCATIN, CIPP Evaluation, Marriage

Abstract

This study analyzes the practice of SUSCATIN at KUA in East Tidore, South Tidore, and Tidore Regency. The analysis uses Bimas Decree No. DJ.II/491 of 2009 which has been in effect for a long time. This study is a field study using the CIPP Evaluation Model (Context, Input, Process, and Product) by Daniel Stufflebeam. Data collection was conducted through in-depth interviews with related parties: Head of KUA, Religious Counselors, and SUSCATIN participants. Documentation was obtained from the SUSCATIN activity archives and KUA Internal reports. The results of this study indicate that in terms of contextual evaluation, the SUSCATIN program has not fully met the needs of prospective brides and grooms because it is carried out incidentally, so it does not address the problems of couples who are going to get married. While the input evaluation is expected to provide support for the SUSCATIN system as a strategy, curriculum identification and SUSCATIN instructor education qualifications, but it is unable to accommodate the needs of the participants. In the evaluation process is still conventional, time constraints and monotonous teaching methods and participant participation has not been achieved optimally so that obstacles are not resolved properly. Thus, the evaluation of the SUSCATIN product is expected to increase the knowledge and skills of participants, but this program has not been running optimally and is still limited, which makes it impossible to create a harmonious and happy family.

References

A. Widodo. Perlindungan Hukum bagi Anak dalam Perspektif Hukum Perkawinan. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2014.

Arief, B.N. Hukum Perkawinan: Dari Teori ke Praktek. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2005.

Asyraf, Suryadin; Winda Purnama, Sari; Nurfitriani, Nurfitriani; Evaluasi Program model CIPP (Context, Input, Process dan Product) antara Teori dan Praktiknya. Yogyakarta: Samudra Biru, 2020.

Burchardt, Dana. “The functions of law and their challenges: The differentiated functionality of international law.” German Law Journal 20, no. 4 (2019): 409–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.29.

Clyde, Tiffany Lura. “The Effects of Premarital Education Promotion Policies on U.S. Divorce Rates.” Brigham Young University, 2019. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7514/.

Daniel L. Stufflebeam, Chris L. S. Coryn. Evaluation Theory, Models, And Applications, Second Edition. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Brand, 2014. https://archive.org/search?query=external-identifier%3A%22urn%3Alcp%3Aevaluationtheory0000stuf%3Alcpdf%3A62dd1d2f-45f4-446a-bbc6-57cdfcb1af33%22.

Depdikbud. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. II. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1994.

Diana, Ayu, dan Ratna Sari. “Jurnal Studi Islam Indonesia (JSII) Evaluasi Program Pendidikan.” Jurnal Studi Islam Indonesia (JSII) 1, no. 1 (2023): 157–66.

E. M. Duval; Reuben Hill. Family Development. Amerika Serikat: Lippincott Company, 1976.

Endih Safari (Kepala KUA Kecamatan Tidore). “Pelaksanaan Kursus Catin.” 2024.

Endih Safari (Kepala KUA Kecamatan Tidore Selatan). “Penyebab Tidak Berjalannya Kursus Catin).” 2024.

Guy Bodenmann. “The relationship between marital satisfaction and couples’ communication patterns.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2000.

Hamzah, A. Perkawinan dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2015.

Hasim Marsaoly (Kepala KUA Tidore Timur). “Proses Pendaftaran Kursus Catin.” 2024.

Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. California: Sage Publication, 1980.

Jay Belsky. The psychology of marriage and family. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1984.

John Gottman; Nan Silver. The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work: A Practical Guide from the Country’s Foremost Relationship Expert. Harmony, 2015.

Kementerian Agama Maluku Utara. “Bina Remaja Pra Nikah, Kakanwil Paparkan Tantangan Pasutri di Era Smartphone.” Kementerian Agama Maluku Utara, Oktober 2020. https://malut.kemenag.go.id/read/bina-remaja-pra-nikah-kakanwil-paparkan-tantangan-pasutri-di-era-smartphone.

Khoiruddin Nasution. Islam Tentang Relasi, Hukum Perkawinan. 1 ed. Yogyakarta: Academia Tazzafa, 2002.

Kiky. “Makna Sakinah, Mawaddah, Warahmah Dalam Kegiatan Bimbingan Perkawinan.” Kementerian Agama RI, November 2024. https://dki.kemenag.go.id/berita/makna-sakinah-mawaddah-warahmah-dalam-kegiatan-bimbingan-perkawinan-s0j2U.

Lasisi;, Adekola Kamil; Shittu, Abdullateef. “Edukasi Emotional-Focused Skills as Determinants of Marital Satisfaction.” Edukasi 17, no. 2 (2023): 259–65.

Martoredjo, Nikodemus. “KETERAMPILAN MENDENGARKAN SECARA AKTIF DALAM KOMUNIKASI INTERPERSONAL.” Humaniora 5, no. 1 (2020): 501–9.

Medellu, Gita Irianda Rizkyani, dan Fathimah Adilla Azzahra. “Emotion Regulation Strategies on Family Functioning among Young Married Couples.” ‎‎‎TAZKIYA Journal of Psychology 10, no. 2 (2022): 132–44. https://doi.org/10.15408/tazkiya.v10i2.22782.

Muntaha, M. Peran Hukum dalam Perkawinan dan Keluarga. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.

Munthe, Ashiong P. “PENTINGYA EVALUASI PROGRAM DI INSTITUSI PENDIDIKAN: Sebuah Pengantar, Pengertian, Tujuan dan Manfaat.” Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 5, no. 2 (2015): 1. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2015.v5.i2.p1-14.

Nurkhaerah, Sitti, Muhammad Syarif, Hasyim Besse, Tenriabeng Mursyid, dan U I N Datokarama Palu. “KETAHANAN RUMAH TANGGA,” 2019, 179–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24239/familia.v5i2.

Nyarks, A. Hipe, M.M. “Impact of Effective Communication on a Marriage.” International Journal of Research in Education, Science and Technology 4, no. 2 (2021): 33–40.

Parker, L. Legal Aspects of Marriage and Family. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

R. Klein. Family Law: Cases, Text, Problems. New York: Aspen Punlishers, 2003.

Rama, Alzet, Ambiyar Ambiyar, Fahmi Rizal, Nizwardi Jalinus, Waskito Waskito, dan Rizky Ema Wulansari. “Konsep model evaluasi context, input, process dan product (CIPP) di sekolah menengah kejuruan.” JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) 8, no. 1 (28 Juni 2023): 82. https://doi.org/10.29210/30032976000.

Rita, Holm Adzovie, dan Tawiah Dabone Kyeremeh. “Relationship between premarital counselling and marital success: Perceptions of married Christians in Ghana.” International Journal of Psychology and Counselling 13, no. 1 (31 Januari 2021): 10–16. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPC2020.0625.

Rohmah, Lulus Faqihatur, IGAA Noviekayati, dan Sahat Saragih. “Effective Communication Training to Improve the Satisfaction of Wedding Marriage / Long Distance Marriage (LDM) Review Marriage Commitments from Marriage Commitment.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 7, no. 8 (2020): 459. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i8.1947.

Ruiz-García, Miguel, Juan Ozaita, María Pereda, Antonio Alfonso, Pablo Brañas-Garza, José A. Cuesta, dan Angel Sánchez. “Triadic influence as a proxy for compatibility in social relationships.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, no. 13 (28 Maret 2023). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215041120.

Siti Muyana. “Context Input Process Product (Cipp): Model Evaluasi Layanan Informasi.” Prosiding Seminar Bimbingan dan Konseling 1, no. 1 (2017): 347. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/267023644.pdf.

Sjahruddin, M. Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rhineka Cipta, 2010.

Sudarsono, D. Aspek Hukum Perkawinan dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Indonseia Press, 2016.